RSS
 

Archive for the ‘Implied volatility’ Category

Volatility Derivatives

10 Jul

Article by: Peter Carr, Roger Lee
Published by: New York University
Date: 27 Aug 2009

“Volatility derivatives are a class of derivative securities where the payoff explicitly depends on some measure of the volatility of an underlying asset. Prominent examples of these derivatives include variance swaps and VIX futures and options. We provide an overview of the current market for these derivatives. We also survey the early literature on the subject. Finally, we provide relatively simple proofs of some fundamental results related to variance swaps and volatility swaps.”

Full article (PDF): Link

 
Comments Off

Posted in Implied volatility, Realized volatility

 

A Glitch in the VIX

30 Jun

Article by: Adam Warner
Published by: InvestorPlace
Date: 24 Mar 2010

“If there’s one point I’ve tried to make more than any other, it’s that the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) is a statistic, not a stock and, as such, it behaves differently than a stock. This being the case, it has quirks, one of which I call the ‘day of the week quirk.’

“This is the tendency of the VIX to look weaker on Fridays and stronger on Mondays, even when there has been no real change in the market’s assessment of volatility.”

Full article: Link

 
Comments Off

Posted in Implied volatility

 

The Distribution of Stock Return Volatility

29 Jun

Article by: Torben G. Andersen, Tim Bollerslev, Francis X. Diebold, Heiko Ebens
Published by: The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania
Date: Oct 2000

“We exploit direct model-free measures of daily equity return volatility and correlation obtained from high-frequency intraday transaction prices on individual stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average over a five-year period to confirm, solidify and extend existing characterizations of stock return volatility and correlation. We find that the unconditional distributions of the variances and covariances for all thirty stocks are leptokurtic and highly skewed to the right, while the logarithmic standard deviations and correlations all appear approximately Gaussian. Moreover, the distributions of the returns scaled by the realized standard deviations are also Gaussian. Consistent with our documentation of remarkably precise scaling laws under temporal aggregation, the realized logarithmic standard deviations and correlations all show strong temporal dependence and appear to be well described by long-memory processes. Positive returns have less impact on future variances and correlations than negative returns of the same absolute magnitude, although the economic importance of this asymmetry is minor. Finally, there is strong evidence that equity volatilities and correlations move together, possibly reducing the benefits to portfolio diversification when the market is most volatile. Our findings are broadly consistent with a latent volatility fact or structure, and they set the stage for improved high-dimensional volatility modeling and out-of-sample forecasting, which in turn hold promise for the development of better decision making in practical situations of risk management, portfolio allocation, and asset pricing.”

Full article (PDF): Link

 
Comments Off

Posted in Implied volatility, Realized volatility

 

Priced Risk and Asymmetric Volatility in the Cross-Section of Skewness

22 Jun

Article by: Robert Engle, Abhishek Mistry
Published by: New York University, Stern School of Business
Date: 12 Aug 2007

“We investigate the sources of skewness in aggregate risk-factors and the cross-section of stock returns. In an ICAPM setting with conditional volatility, we find theoretical time series predictions on the relationships among volatility, returns, and skewness for priced risk factors. Market returns resemble these predictions; however, size, bookto-market, and momentum factor returns show alternative behavior, leading us to conclude these factors are not priced risks. We link aggregate risk and skewness to individual stocks and find empirically that the risk aversion effect manifests in individual stock skewness. Additionally, we find several firm characteristics that explain stock skewness. Smaller firms, value firms, highly levered firms, and firms with poor credit ratings have more positive skewness.”

Full article (PDF): Link

 
Comments Off

Posted in Implied volatility

 
 
© Copyright 2018 RealVol LLC. All rights reserved