RSS
 

Parametric and nonparametric volatility measurement

01 Apr 2012

Article by: Torben G. Andersen, Tim Bollerslev, and Francis X. Diebold
Published by: Wharton School, Univ. of Penn.
Date: Jul 2002

“Volatility has been one of the most active areas of research in empirical finance and time series econometrics during the past decade. This chapter provides a unified continuous-time, frictionless, no-arbitrage framework for systematically categorizing the various volatility concepts, measurement procedures, and modeling procedures. We define three different volatility concepts: (i) the notional volatility corresponding to the ex-post sample-path return variability over a fixed time interval, (ii) the ex-ante expected volatility over a fixed time interval, and (iii) the instantaneous volatility corresponding to the strength of the volatility process at a point in time. The parametric procedures rely on explicit functional form assumptions regarding the expected and/or instantaneous volatility. In the discrete-time ARCH class of models, the expectations are formulated in terms of directly observable variables, while the discrete- and continuous-time stochastic volatility models involve latent state variable(s). The nonparametric procedures are generally free from such functional form assumptions and hence afford estimates of notional volatility that are flexible yet consistent (as the sampling frequency of the underlying returns increases). The nonparametric procedures include ARCH filters and smoothers designed to measure the volatility over infinitesimally short horizons, as well as the recently-popularized realized volatility measures for (non-trivial) fixed-length time intervals.”

Full article (PDF): Link

 
Comments Off

Posted in Implied volatility, Realized volatility

 

Time-changed Levy processes and option pricing

12 Mar 2012

Article by: Peter Carr, Liuren Wu
Published by: Journal of Financial Economics
Date: 5 Aug 2002

“The classic Black-Scholes option pricing model assumes that returns follow Brownian motion, but return processes differ from this benchmark in at least three important ways. First, asset prices jump, leading to non-normal return innovations. Second, return volatilities vary stochastically over time. Third, returns and their volatilities are correlated, often negatively for equities. Time-changed Levy processes can simultaneously address these three issues. We show that our framework encompasses almost all of the models proposed in the option pricing literature, and it is straightforward to select and test a particular option pricing model through the use of characteristic function technology.

Full article (PDF): Link

 
Comments Off

Posted in Hedging

 

Pricing Methods and Hedging Strategies for Volatility Derivatives

28 Feb 2012

Article by: H. Windcliff, P.A. Forsythy, K.R. Vetzal
Published by: The Journal of Derivatives
Date: 4 May 2003

“In this paper we investigate the behaviour and hedging of discretely observed volatility derivatives. We begin by comparing the effects of variations in the contract design, such as the differences between specifying log returns or actual returns, taking into consideration the impact of possible jumps in the underlying asset. We then focus on the difficulties associated with hedging these products. Naive delta-hedging strategies are ineffective for hedging volatility derivatives since they require very frequent rebalancing and have limited ability to protect the writer against possible jumps in the underlying asset. We investigate the performance of a hedging strategy for volatility swaps that establishes small, fixed positions in straddles and out-of-the-money strangles at each volatility observation.”

Full article (PDF): Link

 
Comments Off

Posted in Hedging, Trading ideas

 

Volatility Risk Premiums Embedded in Individual Equity Options: Some New Insights

05 Feb 2012

Article by: Gurdip Bakshi and Nikunj Kapadia
Published by: The Journal of Derivatives
Date: Fall 2003

“The research indicates that index option prices incorporate a negative volatility risk premium, thus providing a possible explanation of why Black-Scholes implied volatilities of index options on average exceed realized volatilities. This examination of the empirical implication of a market volatility risk premium on 25 individual equity options provides some new insights.

“While the Black-Scholes implied volatilities from individual equity options are also greater on average than historical return volatilities, the difference between them is much smaller than for the market index. Like index options, individual equity option prices embed a negative market volatility risk premium, although much smaller than for the index option — and idiosyncratic volatility does not appear to be priced.

“These empirical results provide a potential explanation of why buyers of individual equity options leave less money on the table than buyers of index options.”

Full article (PDF): Link

 
Comments Off

Posted in Implied volatility, Realized volatility

 
 
© Copyright 2018 RealVol LLC. All rights reserved